Nuclear Power Stations of the World, and the Countries that Host Them
Posted: Tuesday, March 22, 2011
by Mogama
http://www.mogama.info
The tragic scenario in Japan should put all of us on notice that keeping nuclear power stations safe is not entirely up to humans anymore. Mindless earthquakes, tsunamis, storms and other natural disasters have a huge say-so in whether or not one or more nuke power plants become radiative cigars.
Now, if just one nuclear power plant tampered by an earthquake in Japan can pose this much danger, what would happen if a 10.0 or higher earthquake were to compromise a nuclear installation or two? One earthquake of just the right impact, and an entire region or nation could become radiation zone, leaving our experts scrambling for fleeting solutions. Simply put, our trusted nuclear engineers, nuclear scientists and specialists are not as in charge of these ticking time bombs as we would prefer to presume.
We are not even talking nuclear weapons here. We're talking “peaceful” nuclear power plants built to provide electricity more “cheaply” than electric power from fossil fuel. The smart people keep reminding us of how few and far between serious nuclear accidents are. The Chernobyl disaster happened in Russia nearly 25 years ago, April 26, 1986.
Is is hysteria to be concerned about the number of nuclear power stations in the world?
Let's keep in mind that emissions of nuclear radiation would not recognize national borders between neighboring countries, even if there's a river or fence separating the two nations! Nuclear radiation leaps rivers and jumps fences. A nuclear mishap in Pakistan could become just as deadly in India.
Here are the nations that currently have operational nuclear power stations. The list is from the lowest to the highest number of nuclear stations.
Having tasted the lure of nuclear electricity, some nations have primed their gears to build even more. Not counting planned or proposed nuclear power stations, here are the numbers of new stations being built at the time of this writing:
While the argument for nuclear power totes the line of cleaner energy, the real story is that nuclear power is often about something more valuable than electricity. Producing nuclear energy has become a game changer, a coming of age, giving each nuke-powered nation a sense of scientific smart and achievement, a halo of national respect, pride and power (not just electrical power). Thus a nuclear station has virtually the same effect in world politics as owning nuclear weapon. Nuclear power is how nations flex their muscles throughout our global village.
So who cares if an earthquake turns one of these sleeping hells into an abyss of radiation that imperils health and lives? So be it. The important thing is that we have scientifically arrived, and we cannot be pushed around anymore. “We can nuke like you, so you'd better respect us around here, or else!” With collective grand egos soaring that high, it often takes nothing less than a nuclear accident or disaster or a close call to jerk us back to earth, which will hopefully remain our peaceful home for years to come.
Source: World Nuclear Association (WNA)
Now, if just one nuclear power plant tampered by an earthquake in Japan can pose this much danger, what would happen if a 10.0 or higher earthquake were to compromise a nuclear installation or two? One earthquake of just the right impact, and an entire region or nation could become radiation zone, leaving our experts scrambling for fleeting solutions. Simply put, our trusted nuclear engineers, nuclear scientists and specialists are not as in charge of these ticking time bombs as we would prefer to presume.
Is is hysteria to be concerned about the number of nuclear power stations in the world?
Let's keep in mind that emissions of nuclear radiation would not recognize national borders between neighboring countries, even if there's a river or fence separating the two nations! Nuclear radiation leaps rivers and jumps fences. A nuclear mishap in Pakistan could become just as deadly in India.
Here are the nations that currently have operational nuclear power stations. The list is from the lowest to the highest number of nuclear stations.
- Armenia, Netherlands, and Slovenia: 1 each
- Brazil, Bulgaria, Mexico, Pakistan, Romania, South Africa: 2 each
- Finland, Hungary, Slovakia: 4 each
- Switzerland: 5
- Czech Republic: 6
- Belgium: 7
- Spain: 8
- Sweden: 10
- China: 13
- Ukraine: 15
- Germany: 17
- Canada: 18
- United Kingdom: 19
- India: 20
- South Korea: 21
- Russia: 32
- Japan: 55
- France: 58
- United States: 104, leading the world right now
Having tasted the lure of nuclear electricity, some nations have primed their gears to build even more. Not counting planned or proposed nuclear power stations, here are the numbers of new stations being built at the time of this writing:
- Argentina : 1
- Brazil: 1
- Finland: 1
- France: 1
- Pakistan: 1
- Canada: 2
- Japan: 2 (Do you think the Fukushima incident will cause the Japanese to halt construction on these new nuke plants?)
- Slovakia: 2
- India: 5
- South Korea: 5
- Russia: 10
- China: 27, the leader in new nuke constructions.
While the argument for nuclear power totes the line of cleaner energy, the real story is that nuclear power is often about something more valuable than electricity. Producing nuclear energy has become a game changer, a coming of age, giving each nuke-powered nation a sense of scientific smart and achievement, a halo of national respect, pride and power (not just electrical power). Thus a nuclear station has virtually the same effect in world politics as owning nuclear weapon. Nuclear power is how nations flex their muscles throughout our global village.
So who cares if an earthquake turns one of these sleeping hells into an abyss of radiation that imperils health and lives? So be it. The important thing is that we have scientifically arrived, and we cannot be pushed around anymore. “We can nuke like you, so you'd better respect us around here, or else!” With collective grand egos soaring that high, it often takes nothing less than a nuclear accident or disaster or a close call to jerk us back to earth, which will hopefully remain our peaceful home for years to come.
Source: World Nuclear Association (WNA)
This Article has been viewed 2,311 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (1 total)Have you ever thought about Wormwood mentioned in the Bible? I know it says it is connected with a "star" but nuclear waste would do what it is describing... I agree with you in your observations here. My brother-in-law has worked in the power plant industry for years and always said nuclear power was totally safe - I should ask his perspective now....thanks for sharing these stats and your thoughts.Interesting, the Wormwood connection. I'm thinking of a follow-up article that will reference Revelation. Thanks for sharing.
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.

