Pregnant Soldiers Won't Face Court-Martial, But They Won't Go Unpunished Either
Posted: Tuesday, December 22, 2009
by Mogama
http://www.mogama.info
The Associated Press reports that last month, Major General Anthony Cucolo, who commands 22,000 American soldiers in northern Iraq, issued a policy that prescribed court-martial for pregnant soldiers and their sexual partners. That means soldiers could be jailed for becoming pregnant.
Joining the army in 1978, Anthony Cucolo has served for 31 years. The battle-tested soldier took part in the wars of Bosnia, Afghanistan, and Iraq. Presently he is Commander of the Third Infantry Division of Fort Stewart, Georgia.
His controversial pregnancy policy went into effect on November 4, 2009.

“Cucolo is believed to be the first to make the pregnancy an offense that could be dealt with by court-martial — for both the man and the woman. The ruling only applies to troops under his command..."
In less than a month, Gen. Cucolo has already backed away from the policy, saying, “I have never considered court-martial for this, I do not ever see myself putting a soldier in jail for this." But the General insists that pregnancy during deployment is unacceptable, because it leaves the pregnant soldier's unit weakened.
While pregnant rape victims are exempt from the rule, there seems to be no leniency for female soldiers whose pregnancies were caused by sexual encounters with their own husbands.
Besides the obvious fact that the General's policy will add to the stigma of pregnant soldiers – that female soldiers get pregnant as their ticket to leave the combat zone – there is the perturbing notion of criminalizing pregnancy. Framed as a question, “Is pregnancy during deployment a punishable crime?
Also, isn't General Cucolo indirectly making it the rule for female soldiers to take contraception? And if that is the case, then does that not impose on conservative Catholic female soldiers, who do not believe in the use of contraception?
Though, Mr. Cucolo says a lawyer has nodded his policy, it is still possible that lawsuits could result from a rule of this nature. With that likelihood it should not surprise us to hear that the General will be overruled on this policy, or he will be pressured to abandon the no-pregnancy rule entirely.
=>
Click this link to
sign up as a new writer for SearchWarp,
/Register.asp.
Sources: The Associated Press; Wikipedia
This Article has been viewed 338 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (1 total)I can understand the General's viewpoint. His troops actions affect many people and possibly the outcome of the war. I am glad I am not in his position. Thank you for a thought provoking article.Please log in to respond to this comment.Yes, Linda, on the surface General Cucolo's pregnancy policy seems drastic, but you're right, he has his hands full. ~mogama~Please log in to respond to this comment.
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.
