White House Party Crashers Were Up Close with the President... What If?
Posted: Saturday, November 28, 2009
by Mogama
http://www.mogama.info
When the news hit our television
screens that Tareq and Michaele Salahi entered the halls of President
Obama's first state dinner without their names on the guests' list,
the Secret Service spokesperson, Ed Donovan, said in effect, 'The
President was never in any danger.' Take that to mean the sneaky
couple never came anywhere near the president, though they
photo-opted with Vice President Biden.
That story has changed. The truth
bottle has ruptured, and it could not have been more embarrassing to
the Secret Service and to the Obama Administration by extension.
Here is photo-proof that Mr. & Mrs.
Salahi met face to face with the President at the state dinner:

Talk about up close and personal...
Why is this a big deal?
True, the Salahis probably did not mean
any harm to the President or to anyone else in the hall that night.
However, there are certain scary "what if" scenarios that we
can't help but entertain.
What if one of the Salahis had pulled
out an object and attacked the President? What if Mrs. Salahi had
poison or a nano-weapon somewhere on her body? What if Mr. Salahi had
punched the President? What if he had grabbed the President in a
sudden headlock and put the choke hold?
What if the Salahis or someone within
the Secret Service did this to prime the notion of an incompetent
administration, which happens to be headed by a black man? What if
this was done to feed the stereotype of the incompetent black man?
How do we know that had nothing to do with it?
Or perhaps it is not a racial but a
political stereotype in play: That as a general rule, a liberal
administration cannot be trusted with security functions of the
United States, that liberals are naturally soft or even careless on
matters of security. For those who tote that line of thinking, this
White House security breach is a microcosm of the larger national
security vulnerability facing the whole nation in the hands of Mr.
Obama and his pack of "watchdogs".
Even scarier... what if a potential
assassin takes a clue from the Salahi's playbook? What if a
murder-type takes keen interest in slipping through the cracks at the
next White House get-together? Even if the Salahis were helped into
crashing the party, who is to say the same helper(s) might not give a
would-be assassin access to the President?
While there is mounting noise about
potential felony charges being brought against the infamous
party-crashing couple, the bigger story here is incompetence or
betrayal within the ranks of the Secret Service. I would be very
shocked if no one gets fired over this. If the President thinks for a
minute that this is no big deal, he'd better think again. Beyond his
own safety, this debacle reaches the symbolism of the office. This is
about respect for the presidency of the United States, and THAT, my friend, is no
laughing matter.
Great piece and scary potential problems. Your assessment that someone should be fired are warranted - unbelievable. MarijoPlease log in to respond to this comment.There is speculation that the White House may prefer to sweep this thing under the rug. Bad idea. Thanks for commenting. ~mogama~Please log in to respond to this comment.
A very well-written article, Mogama. Let's hope the Secret Service is immediately restored to its former efficiency.Please log in to respond to this comment.Yes, that's the word, "efficiency". Thanks, Carolyn, for commenting. ~mogama~Please log in to respond to this comment.
Hi Mogama,All your questions are worth pondering. They are valid thoughts to be bantered about. From what we know thus far (which possibly is not much until the investigation is completed) the Secret Service dropped the ball in a huge way. I believe or will go out on a limb a tad and say if things appear as they do now people will get fired. It is outrageous and simply unacceptable for anyone to be able to get into the White House so easily. I'm curious what the facts of the investigation turn out to be. Thanks for sharing your viewpoints/concerns.Please log in to respond to this comment.Thanks, Steve, for your input. ~mogama~Please log in to respond to this comment.



